The law categorises the offence against the persons and is defined and punished under Section 37 which states:
(1) A person is guilty of an offence if the person:
(a) intentionally chokes, suffocates or strangles another person so as to render the other person unconscious, insensible or incapable of resistance, and
(b) is reckless as to render the other person unconscious, insensible or incapable of resistance.
Maximum penalty: imprisonment for 10 years.
(2) A person is guilty of an offence if the person:
(a) chokes suffocate or strangles another person so as to render the other person unconscious, insensible or incapable of resistance, and
(b) does so with the intention of enabling himself or herself to commit, or assisting any other person to commit, another indictable offence.
(3) In this section:
“another indictable offence” means an indictable offence other than an offence against this section.
This matter is strictly indictable that is it can only be finalised in the District Court.
The nature and elements of the offence of Attempts to Choke were considered in R v MW  NSWCCA 291. It was recognised that there are “varying degrees of criminality in an offence contrary to s 37.” McClellan CJ at CL added at :
“It must be remembered that the offence itself is defined as an “attempt to choke.” When that attempt results in the victim becoming unconscious the offence is one of considerable gravity”.
Similarly, in R v HQ  NSWCCA 336, it was held that choking the victim to the point where she lapsed into semi-consciousness constituted a serious form of the offence: at .
The maximum penalty for the charge of attempts to choke another person (Section 37 of the Crimes Act) is 25 years of imprisonment.
However, the above-mentioned penalty is reserved only for the worse offences and you might likely not face the same.
In NSW, a court can impose any of the following penalties for an Attempts to Choke charge of:
Since Attempts to Choke a person is a criminal offence and the burden of proof lies on the Prosecution. The prosecution must prove each of the following matters beyond reasonable doubt being that:
(a) attempted to choke, strangle or suffocate any person;
(b) By any means calculated to choke, suffocate or strangle;
(c) Attempted to render any person insensible, unconscious or incapable of resistance;
Some of the possible defences available for those charged with Attempts to Choke include:
For Attempt to Choke, Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers® offers the following options:
For further information on your choices at law click on (CHOICES AT LAW tab on our website)
There are several reasons to engage Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers®:
At Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers® we understand the gravity of a criminal charge on your reputation. Thus, we work with the utmost diligence and fervour to restore any dints to our client’s repute. We fight for your rights and liberty earnestly, and for the best results, irrespective of the intensity of the matter. All these factors have made us known in the industry as always being in our client’s corner.
Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers® is driven by positive outcomes and defend your case with skills which have been sharpened by years of experience. You will be dealing with lawyers who are proficient at their craft and will defend your case with rigour and an aim to have the matter withdrawn, downgraded, dismissed or the minimal penalty available at law imposed.
Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers® are adept in all forms of advocacy and will present your case in the most skilful manner in Court.
Irrespective of your decision in deciding the course of the case, you will be supported and guided by Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers® who have been in the provision of legal service for over 21 years.
If you are caught up in this charge our team at Rep-Revive Criminal & Employment Lawyers® are best suited for representing your case.